<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authentic Conservatism Must Prevail</title>
	<link>http://brownsludge.com/2006/04/16/authentic-conservatism-must-prevail/</link>
	<description>A Conservative Combatting Corporatism</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Xris Xross</title>
		<link>http://brownsludge.com/2006/04/16/authentic-conservatism-must-prevail/#comment-41581</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://brownsludge.com/2006/04/16/authentic-conservatism-must-prevail/#comment-41581</guid>
					<description>I like your analysis of the two types of conservative, and I'm with you in bemoaning how almost all Authentic conservative voices have been drowned out (or swallowed up) by the Gordon Gekko variety. In the last 25 years, if we could have heard a few more Authentic voices loud and clear above the clamoring din of the Gekkoes, it's my guess we wouldn't be floppping around in the economic quagmire we've danced our way into at the beginning of this new millennium.

Ordinarily, I think of myself socio-politically as "liberal" or "progressive," but I positively identify with the Authentic conservative perspective you've laid out here. Like you, I think a completely arrogant greed divorced from any sort of compassion is at the root of the so-called "conservative/neo-con" ideology we've been living with for a long time now.

Ultimately it's much more effective to sit down to a discussion than to stand up for beliefs right or wrong. And it certainly goes a long way toward building a community when both sides actually trust that something might be gained from discourse and dialogue rather than "winning" the argument by shouting down the opposition. Maybe a day will dawn when Authentic conservatives reclaim their territory from the power-mad Gekkoes, and we can put civility back into our Civil Discourse. I hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your analysis of the two types of conservative, and I&#8217;m with you in bemoaning how almost all Authentic conservative voices have been drowned out (or swallowed up) by the Gordon Gekko variety. In the last 25 years, if we could have heard a few more Authentic voices loud and clear above the clamoring din of the Gekkoes, it&#8217;s my guess we wouldn&#8217;t be floppping around in the economic quagmire we&#8217;ve danced our way into at the beginning of this new millennium.</p>
<p>Ordinarily, I think of myself socio-politically as &#8220;liberal&#8221; or &#8220;progressive,&#8221; but I positively identify with the Authentic conservative perspective you&#8217;ve laid out here. Like you, I think a completely arrogant greed divorced from any sort of compassion is at the root of the so-called &#8220;conservative/neo-con&#8221; ideology we&#8217;ve been living with for a long time now.</p>
<p>Ultimately it&#8217;s much more effective to sit down to a discussion than to stand up for beliefs right or wrong. And it certainly goes a long way toward building a community when both sides actually trust that something might be gained from discourse and dialogue rather than &#8220;winning&#8221; the argument by shouting down the opposition. Maybe a day will dawn when Authentic conservatives reclaim their territory from the power-mad Gekkoes, and we can put civility back into our Civil Discourse. I hope so.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mac</title>
		<link>http://brownsludge.com/2006/04/16/authentic-conservatism-must-prevail/#comment-63</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://brownsludge.com/2006/04/16/authentic-conservatism-must-prevail/#comment-63</guid>
					<description>Actually, I've corrected the article link. I had filed it originally under "property rights", but the article I wanted to point to was the article where he stood up for those who wanted to build "vacation properties" near national park lands. Something that just turns my stomache. I've corrected the link. 

As to you're comment about Mr. Sowell being more of a libertarian than a conservative, I'm afraid your right about that. Although I've always thought of him as a great Conservative voice, his views on many things are more in line with libertarianism than they are pure grassroots Conservatism. 

Which is probably why it breaks my heart and feels like such a betrayal when he starts sounding so much like a mouthpiece for the Randian Wing of the Libertarians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;ve corrected the article link. I had filed it originally under &#8220;property rights&#8221;, but the article I wanted to point to was the article where he stood up for those who wanted to build &#8220;vacation properties&#8221; near national park lands. Something that just turns my stomache. I&#8217;ve corrected the link. </p>
<p>As to you&#8217;re comment about Mr. Sowell being more of a libertarian than a conservative, I&#8217;m afraid your right about that. Although I&#8217;ve always thought of him as a great Conservative voice, his views on many things are more in line with libertarianism than they are pure grassroots Conservatism. </p>
<p>Which is probably why it breaks my heart and feels like such a betrayal when he starts sounding so much like a mouthpiece for the Randian Wing of the Libertarians.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://brownsludge.com/2006/04/16/authentic-conservatism-must-prevail/#comment-62</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://brownsludge.com/2006/04/16/authentic-conservatism-must-prevail/#comment-62</guid>
					<description>Uhhhmmm did you read the Sowell article?  He is decrying the Kelo decision as a bad thing.  If anything he is against the real estate developers.  Sowell wrote,

&lt;i&gt;How many private homeowners can afford to litigate such claims all the way up and down the judicial food chain? Apartment dwellers who are thrown out on the street by the bulldozers are even less able to defend themselves with litigation.

 The best that can be said for the Supreme Court majority's opinion is that it follows -- and extends -- certain judicial precedents. But, as Justice Clarence Thomas said in dissent, these "misguided lines of precedent" need to be reconsidered, so as to "return to the original meaning of the Public Use Clause" in the Constitution.
&lt;/i&gt;

He is opposed to the taking of property from private individuals by the government using eminent domain to hand over to other private individuals/concerns.  You have mischaracterized his argument and libeled Mr. Sowell.

Oh, I've always seen Sowell as more of libertarian than a conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhhhmmm did you read the Sowell article?  He is decrying the Kelo decision as a bad thing.  If anything he is against the real estate developers.  Sowell wrote,</p>
<p><i>How many private homeowners can afford to litigate such claims all the way up and down the judicial food chain? Apartment dwellers who are thrown out on the street by the bulldozers are even less able to defend themselves with litigation.</p>
<p> The best that can be said for the Supreme Court majority&#8217;s opinion is that it follows &#8212; and extends &#8212; certain judicial precedents. But, as Justice Clarence Thomas said in dissent, these &#8220;misguided lines of precedent&#8221; need to be reconsidered, so as to &#8220;return to the original meaning of the Public Use Clause&#8221; in the Constitution.<br />
</i></p>
<p>He is opposed to the taking of property from private individuals by the government using eminent domain to hand over to other private individuals/concerns.  You have mischaracterized his argument and libeled Mr. Sowell.</p>
<p>Oh, I&#8217;ve always seen Sowell as more of libertarian than a conservative.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
